0 false positives
Have all findings fully reproduced by a certified security engineer before they reaches your team. If a finding can't be reproduced, it doesn't reach you.
100% decision-ready reports. Zero false positives.
YesWeHack's in-house triage team validates, reproduces and assesses the real-world impact of every finding submitted through your Bug Bounty, Vulnerability Disclosure and Continuous Pentesting programs. So you can focus on fixing vulnerabilities, not filtering reports.
VULNERABILITY VOLUME IS OUTPACING VALIDATION CAPACITY
Crowdsourced security programs and continuous testing engagements generate a constant stream and volume of vulnerability submissions. Each one requires scope validation, reproduction, severity scoring and exploitability assessment before your team can make a single prioritisation decision. As submission volume grows, so does the validation overhead.
The challenge is not just capacity. CVSS does not tell you whether a finding is exploitable in your specific environment. It does not show how it chains with other weaknesses or map out the privilege escalation paths it exposes. Without contextual assessment, teams remediate the loudest findings rather than the most dangerous ones.
100% decision-ready reports
Receive a fully documented exploitation flow: every payload, affected asset and remediation context you need to understand, reproduce and fix the vulnerability.
24/7 triage coverage
Validate and process every submission regardless of when it arrives: nights, weekends and public holidays included.
Industry-Leading Customer Satisfaction
The 6-step process for zero noise
Enrichment of report metadata
- Accelerate vulnerability intake with AI-assisted pre-screening that automatically fills missing fields, preventing incomplete submissions and saving analyst time.
- Receive every submission complete with the full technical context your teams need: affected assets, endpoints, vulnerable parts, payloads, and impact.
- Identify and complete any missing elements before assessment begins, so nothing progresses until the report is understandable and actionable.
Compliance check
Verify every submission against your defined program scope, qualifying vulnerability types and testing rules, before it consumes any engineering time.
Duplication check
- Leverage AI to automatically surface similar past reports, cutting review time and keeping deduplication consistent as submission volume grows.
- Cross-reference every finding against your full program history and all previously submitted reports to ensure your team never sees the same finding twice.
- Flag partial duplicates with full context so nothing is silently dropped and every decision is documented.
Proof-of-concept (PoC) reproduction
- Reproduce every finding independently, step by step, under real conditions, not solely from the researcher's description.
- Eliminate false positives at source so your team only acts on vulnerabilities that are real and confirmed.
- Identify the precise origin of every vulnerability so nothing is misattributed or partially fixed.
- Confirm practical exploitability and establish the full attack context needed for accurate impact assessment.
- Provide developers with a fully documented exploitation flow to follow directly, reducing trial-and-error during fixes and lowering re-open rates.
In-depth impact assessment
- Contextualise every confirmed finding within your specific technical architecture and business environment, not against a generic severity framework.
- Assess lateral movement potential, affected systems, data exposure scope and privilege escalation potential to produce a CVSS score that reflects your actual risk.
- Include explicit prioritisation guidance so your security and engineering team know immediately what to fix first, without additional internal reassessment.
Recommendations
- Deliver a complete set of actionable recommendations with every report: suggested status with written rationale, a calibrated CVSS score and, where applicable, a recommended researcher reward aligned to your program parameters and community expectation.
- Apply all recommendations directly inside the platform with a single click so your team moves straight to remediation without additional deliberation on severity or eligibility.
AI-ASSISTED TRIAGE, EXPERT-LED DECISIONS
YesWeHack integrates AI directly into the Triage workflow to keep assessment consistent and velocity high as submission volumes grow.
- Metadata auto-completion: report fields are enriched at intake based on the submitted description and PoC so analysts begin assessment with a complete, consistently formatted report at any submission volume.
- Validity probability scoring: a model flags low-probability submissions early so triagers focus their attention where it maters.
- Duplicate Scoring: incoming reports are automatically scored for similarity against previous submissions before analyst review begins.
- Severity probability signal: a probability estimate for high or low severity gives analysts an informed starting point before human assessment beings.
- CVSS consistency check: score are benchmarked against previously accepted reports with the same bug type on the same program, flagging inconsistencies.
Every consequential outcome (acceptance, severity assignment, reward recommendation) is owned by a certified YesWeHack security analyst. AI accelerates, it never decides.
Vulnerability Triage Comparison: YesWeHack vs. Other Platforms
YesWeHack
Others
